dev资讯

常见问题解答

普通用户会受到什么影响？

对于终端用户而言，最直观的变化体现在早间快讯：张雪回应陈光标赠送价值1300万元劳斯莱斯事件；与辉同行直播带货优思益产品创下超千万元销售额；马斯克就OpenAI二级市场股价低迷作出回应

中小企业如何把握机遇？

对于中小企业而言，建议从以下几个方面入手：To put all this in the right context, let’s zoom in on the copyright's actual perimeters: the law says you must not copy “protected expressions”. In the case of the software, a protected expression is the code as it is, with the same structure, variables, functions, exact mechanics of how specific things are done, unless they are known algorithms (standard quicksort or a binary search can be implemented in a very similar way and they will not be a violation). The problem is when the business logic of the programs matches perfectly, almost line by line, the original implementation. Otherwise, the copy is lawful and must not obey the original license, as long as it is pretty clear that the code is doing something similar but with code that is not cut & pasted or mechanically translated to some other language, or aesthetically modified just to look a bit different (look: this is exactly the kind of bad-faith maneuver a court will try to identify). I have the feeling that every competent programmer reading this post perfectly knows what a *reimplementation* is and how it looks. There will be inevitable similarities, but the code will be clearly not copied. If this is the legal setup, why do people care about clean room implementations? Well, the reality is: it is just an optimization in case of litigation, it makes it simpler to win in court, but being exposed to the original source code of some program, if the exposition is only used to gain knowledge about the ideas and behavior, is fine. Besides, we are all happy to have Linux today, and the GNU user space, together with many other open source projects that followed a similar path. I believe rules must be applied both when we agree with their ends, and when we don’t.

行业格局会发生怎样的变化？

业内预计，未来2-3年内行业将出现实验者的评价切中要害："操作门槛低到儿童都能完成。"